NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Azmin Firoz Daya v CX Reinsurance Company Limited [2012] NSWSC 1294 Hearing dates: 15 October 2012 Decision date: 15 October 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Commercial List Before: Brereton J Decision: Objection to evidence by Messrs Peck and Murray overruled; Defendants to serve statements of evidence by 19 October 2012; Defendants to pay Plaintiff's costs of motion Catchwords: EVIDENCE - whether late notice of intention to adduce evidence of certain witnesses would cause prejudice to plaintiff - whether evidence ought to be excluded Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Azmin Firoz Daya - Plaintiff CX Reinsurance Company Ltd (formerly CNA Reinsurance Ltd) - First Defendant GE Frankona Reinsurance Ltd (formerly Eagle Star Reinsurance Company Ltd) - Second Defendant Aviva Plc (formerly General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp plc) - Third Defendant Certain Underwriters at Lloyds (Contract No ENCDOPR98) - Fourth Defendant Royal & Sun Alliance plc - Fifth Defendant Certain Underwriters at Lloyds (Contract No ENCDOX598) - Sixth Defendant International Insurance Company of Hannover Ltd - Seventh Defendant Representation: Counsel: Dr Bell SC w Mr J Williams - Plaintiff Mr J Sexton SC w Mr E Muston & Ms S Callan - First to Sixth Defendants Solicitors: Sparke Helmore - Plaintiff HWL Ebsworth - First to Sixth Defendants File Number(s): 2004/ 175282
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate