NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Barel v Segal (No 3) [2012] NSWSC 1319 Hearing dates: 24 October 2012 Decision date: 02 November 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Expedition List Before: Pembroke J Decision: See [16] and [17] Catchwords: COSTS - partition suit - analogous to dissolution of partnership - general principle as to costs Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Conveyancing Act 1919 Cases Cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dataline.net.au Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 1427 Hamod v State of New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 375 Kardos v Sarbutt (No 2) [2006] NSWCA 206 Kiwi Munchies v Stern [2006] NSWSC 433 Lo Surdo v Public Trustee [2005] NSWSC 1290 Maio v Sacco (No 2) [2009] NSWSC 413 McKay v McKay (Costs) [2008] NSWSC 256 Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Ritchie (No 2) (unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Powell J, 25 November 1988) Spathis v Nanos (No 2) [2008] NSWSC 470 Squire v Rogers (1979) 27 ALR 330 Texts Cited: Equity Proceedings with Precedents (New South Wales) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Elie Barel - plaintiff Phillip Segal - defendant Representation: Counsel: J Van Aalst - for the plaintiff G Waugh - for the defendant Solicitors: Coopers Lawyers - for the plaintiff Low Doherty & Stratford - for the defendant File Number(s): 2010/412807
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate