NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Welker v Rinehart (No 10) [2012] NSWSC 1330 Hearing dates: Wednesday, 12 September 2012 Decision date: 31 October 2012 Before: Brereton J Decision: Defendants' application for summary dismissal dismissed. Plaintiffs granted leave to amend, save in one respect. Catchwords: PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - application for summary dismissal - whether cause of action to remove trustee survives vesting of trust - test for summary dismissal - whether case is hopeless, without prospects of success or doomed to failure
TRUSTS - application for summary dismissal of application to remove trustee - where trust has vested after application for removal - nature of duties of a trustee of a vested trust - grounds for removal of a trustee - whether safety of the trust is the central consideration - court's interest in the due administration of the trust - whether it is inevitable that case for removal must fail
TRUSTS - order for production of trust documents and accounts - application for summary dismissal - whether plaintiffs entered into deed releasing their right to make such a claim
PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - application for leave to amend statement of claim - where new facts are alleged to have occurred after the original pleading - where plaintiff seeks to add new grounds of relief - whether proposed pleading articulates cause of action for equitable compensation Cases Cited: Welker & Ors v Rinehart & Anor (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 1238 Welker & Ors v Rinehart & Anor (No 4) [2011] NSWSC 1636 Rinehart v Welker [2012] NSWCA 95 Wickstead v Browne [1992] NSWCA 272; (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 Re Wrightson [1908] 1 Ch 789 Fay v Moramba Services Pty Limited [2009] NSWSC 1428 Guazzini v Paterson (1918) 18 SR (NSW) 275 Letterstedt v Broers (1884) 9 App Cas 371 Miller v Cameron [1936] HCA 13; (1936) 54 CLR 572 Craven-Sands v Koch [2000] NSWSC 374; (2000) 34 ACSR 341 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Hope Rinehart Welker (First plaintiff) John Langley Hancock (Second plaintiff) Bianca Hope Rinehart (Third plaintiff) Gina Hope Rinehart (First Defendant) Ginia Hope Frances Rinehart (Second defendant) Representation: Counsel: Dr A Bell SC w Mr DFC Thomas (Plaintiffs) Mr D G Russell QC w M L Roberton & Mr C Bova (First defendant) Mr F Kunc SC w Mr W Flynn (Second defendant) Solicitors: Johnson Winter & Slattery (Plaintiffs) Corrs Chambers Westgarth (First defendant) Gadens (Second defendant) File Number(s): 2011/285907
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate