NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Council of the Law Society of NSW v Nicholls [2012] NSWADT 222 Hearing dates: 17 May 2012 Decision date: 31 October 2012 Jurisdiction: Legal Services Division Before: M Riordan, Judicial Member J Wakefield, Judicial Member Prof. R Fitzgerald, Non Judicial Member Decision: 1. The Respondent Solicitor is guilty of professional misconduct. Catchwords: Solicitor - Disciplinary proceeding - Practice in breach of provisions regulating trust accounts - Legal Profession Act 2004 Sections 254, 260 - Intermixing trust monies with other monies - misappropriation - penalty Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Act 2004 Cases Cited: Brereton v Legal Services Commissioner [2010] VSC 378 Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v. Clapin [2011] NSWADT 83 Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v. Simpson [2011] NSWADT 242 Council of the Queensland Law Society Inc v Wakeling [2004] QCA 42 Daly v. Sydney Stock Exchange Limited [1986] HCA 25; (1986) 160 CLR 371 Harle v Legal Practitioners Liability Committee (2004) 13 ANZ Insurance Cases 61-605 Lancashire Railway Co v. MacNicoll(1919) 88 LJKB 601 Law Society of NSW v. Doherty [2010] NSWCA 177 Law Society of New South Wales v. McCarthy [2003] NSWADT 198 Legal Practitioners Conduct Board v. Jones [2010] SAS CFC 51 Legal Services Commissioner v. Brereton[2011] VSCA 241 Myers v. Ellman [1940] AC 282 Penfolds Wines Pty Ltd v. Elliott (1946) 74 CLR 204 Peters v. R(1998) [1998] HCA 7: 192 CLR 493 Stewart v. Layton(1992) 111 ALR 687 Texts Cited: Riley, Solicitors Manual: Commentary (ed G Dal Pont: Butterworths, 2005, updated) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Council of the Law Society of New South Wales (Applicant) Fay Marie Veronica Nicholls (Respondent) Representation: C Groenewegen (Applicant) F M V Nicholls (Respondent In Person) File Number(s): 122008
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate