NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Mishra [2012] NSWSC 1333 Hearing dates: 31 October 2012 Decision date: 07 November 2012 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: 1. The Defendants' application in relation to costs paid since August 2012 is dismissed. 2. The Defendants are to pay the costs of this application. Catchwords: MORTGAGES - mortgages and charges generally - remedies of the mortgagee - discharge of mortgage - mortgagor threatens cross-claim to challenge mortgage - whether mortgagee can require additional amount as security for contingent liability in return for discharge - whether proceedings reasonably anticipated. Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law Cases Cited: Baker v Biddle (1923) 33 CLR 188 Kreglinger v New Patagonia Meat and Cold Storage Co Ltd [1914] AC 25 Liberty Funding Pty Limited v Steele-Smith [2004] NSWSC 1100 Overton Investments Pty Ltd v Cuzeno RVM Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCA 27 Perpetual Trustees Australia Ltd v Barker [2004] SASC 58 Category: Costs Parties: Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (Plaintiff) Anil Chand Mishra (First Defendant) Suman Mishra (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: L Livingston (Plaintiff) J O'Connor (Defendant) Solicitors: Kemp Strang (Plaintiff) KB Legals Pty Ltd (Defendants) File Number(s): 2011/369292
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate