NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Regina v Fysh (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 1340 Hearing dates: 2,5 November 2012 Decision date: 07 November 2012 Before: McCallum J Decision: Application for directed verdicts refused Catchwords: CRIME - particular offences - insider trading - no case submission - whether Crown had adduced evidence upon which a jury could convict - possession of alleged inside information - whether particulars to be taken in combination - whether Crown required to prove possession of every component of alleged inside information - whether failure to prove any individual component fatal to Crown case - materiality of alleged inside information - whether evidence so lacking as to require jury to speculate Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Cases Cited: Doney v R [1990] HCA 51; (1990) 171 CLR 207 EPA v Sydney Water Corporation [1997] 98 A Crim R 481 Hannes v DPP (No 2) [2006] NSWCCA 373 R v Hannes [2000] NSWCCA 503 R v Rivkin [2004] NSWCCA 7 R v Saffron (1988) 17 NSWLR 395 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Stuart Alfred Fysh Representation: Counsel: D Staehli SC and J Single (Crown) B Walker SC and I Pike SC (accused) Solicitors: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Gilbert & Tobin Lawyers (accused) File Number(s): 2011/15688 Publication restriction: Decision not to be posted on the Internet until after the conclusion of the trial presently being heard by McCallum J with a jury
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate