NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Roberts v R [2012] NSWCCA 232 Hearing dates: 15 February 2012 Decision date: 15 February 2012 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] Hidden J at [26] Rothman J at [27] Decision: Leave to appeal refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - sentence - application for leave to appeal - whether sentencing judge erred in finding that offence was "at least in the middle of any scale" - where offence involved remaining on premises with weapon with intent to intimidate victim - finding of sentencing judge in relation to objective seriousness was open - whether sentence was manifestly excessive - where offence committed in breach of ADVO - where there was history of domestic violence perpetrated against victim - where applicant has serious criminal history - sentence not manifestly excessive - leave to appeal refused. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Summary Offences Act 1988 Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence Act) 2007 Cases Cited: Ayoub and El Mazri v R (2010) NSWCCA 196 R v Hamid (2006) NSWCCA 302 The Queen v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 303 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Colin Ronald Roberts (Applicant) Crown Representation: D O'Neil (Applicant) N J Gouda (Crown) Legal Aid of NSW (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2010/65265 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2010-12-08 00:00:00 Before: McLoughlin DCJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate