NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Northern Eruv Incorporated v Ku-ring-gai Council [2012] NSWLEC 249 Hearing dates: 6 August 2012 Decision date: 30 November 2012 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Craig J Decision: 1. Appeal dismissed. 2. Appellant to pay the costs of the Respondent. 3. Exhibit may be returned. Catchwords: APPEAL - s 56A Land and Environment Court Act 1979 - development applications to erect a pole or poles on residential allotments as a component of an Eruv - erection of pole or poles incidental to use as a dwelling house - development appeals pursuant to s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 - application to respondent under s 138 of the Roads Act 1993 for consent to construct an Eruv along 20kms of public road - jurisdiction of Court to consent to the latter application when determining appeals pursuant to s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 - scope of power under s 39(2) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to determine the application under the Roads Act - power not available - no error of law Legislation Cited: Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000
Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Roads Act 1993
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Australian Leisure and Hospitality Group Pty Ltd v Manly Council (No 4) [2009] NSWLEC 226; (2009) 172 LGERA 1
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate