NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Markisic v State of New South Wales & Ors (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 1353 Hearing dates: 18 February 2008 to 20 February 2008 25 February 2008, 27 February 2008 2 October 2012. Decision date: 08 November 2012 Before: Price J Decision: The plaintiff's application for leave to file an amended statement of claim (defamation claim) is refused. Catchwords: DEFAMATION - application to re-plead defamation claims - whether publications additional to the Court of Appeal's grant of leave pleaded - whether new imputations pleaded - whether imputations are untenable - whether publications attracted absolute privilege - issue estoppel - Defamation Act 1974 - application for the return of a child under the Hague Convention - whether publications incidental to and necessary to judicial proceedings - whether communications between officers of State - necessary to effective performance of official functions - whether proposed proceedings futile. Legislation Cited: Defamation Act 1974 s 11, s 17-19 Family Law (Child Abduction Convention) Regulations 1986 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction Limitation Act 1969 s 14 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules r 15.19(1)(b) Cases Cited: Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd v Marsden (1998) 43 NSWLR 158 De L v Director-General, NSW Department of Community Services [1996] HCA 5; (1996) 187 CLR 64 Drummond - Jackson v British Medical Association [1970] 1 ALL ER 1094 FAI General Insurance Co Ltd v RAIA Insurance Brokers Ltd (1992) 108 ALR 479 Favell v Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd [2005] HCA 52; 221 ALR 186 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) [1964] HCA 69; (1964) 112 CLR 125 Gibbons v Duffell (1932) 47 CLR 520 Lewis v Daily Telegraph Ltd [1964] AC 234 Mann v O'Neill [1997] HCA 28; (1997) 191 CLR 204 Markisic v Department of Community Services of New South Wales [2005] NSWSC 1373 Markisic v Department of Community Services of New South Wales (No 2) [2006] NSWCA 321 Mirror Newspapers Ltd v Harrison [1982] HCA 50; (1982) 149 CLR 293 Nixon v Slater & Gordon [2000] FCA 531; (2000) 175 ALR 15 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 45; (1981) 147 CLR 589 Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd v Chesterton [2009] HCA 16, (2009) 238 CLR 460 Rajski v Carson (1986) 4 NSWLR 735 Reader's Digest Services Pty Ltd v Lamb [1982] HCA 4; (1982) 150 CLR 500 Texts Cited: Gatley on Libel and Slander, 11th ed, (2008) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dragan Markisic (Plaintiff) State of New South Wales (Second Defendant) Commonwealth of Australia (Third Defendant) Representation: Mr Dragan Markisic in person (Plaintiff) Mr B McClintock SC & V Hartstein (Second Defendant) Mr D Robinson SC (Third Defendant) File Number(s): 2000/4264
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate