NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Peter Richardson v Mirvac Constructions Pty Limited [2012] NSWDC 204 Decision date: 11 July 2012 Before: Cogswell SC DCJ Decision: Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff against all defendants in the sum of $750,000. Catchwords: Negligence - project home balustrade gave way - personal injury - severe back injury requiring surgery, ongoing disability - parties: project home builder, staircase manufacturer, balustrade installer - responsibility for negligence of independent contractor - nature of duties owed by each defendant - question of inspection of work of subcontractors - balustrade affixed with gun driven nails - limitation of action - claim in contract against first defendant statute barred - limitation period for the cause of action against third defendant extended - damages - construction of s 50C and 50D of the Limitation Act 1969 - apportionment of responsibility and damages. Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002, s5D and s5E. Limitation Act 1969, s14, s50A, s50C, s50D, s50E, s60D and s60E. Cases Cited: Argyropoulos v Layton [2002] NSWCA 183 Leichhardt Municipal Council v Montgomery [2007] HCA 6; (2007) 230 CLR 22 New South Wales v Gillett [2012] NSWCA 83. Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Richardson (Plaintiff) Mirvac Constructions Pty Limited (First defendant) WB Jones Staircase and Handrail Pty Limited (Second defendant) JMKG Pty Limited (Third defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr MG Gilbert (Plaintiff) Mr J Catsanos (First defendant) Mr RA Cavanagh SC (Second defendant) Mr PJ Gow (Third defendant) Solicitors: Mr BA Pierce (Plaintiff) Mr A Oag (First defendant) File Number(s): DC 2009/337542
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate