NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Silas Gordon Haines v R [2012] NSWCCA 238 Hearing dates: 26 October 2012 Decision date: 21 November 2012 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] Bellew J at [2] Barr AJ at [66] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted; 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - forced entry into residential premises followed by multiple offences of robbery and aggravated sexual assault - one episode of offending - offences committed whilst applicant on parole for previous offence of sexual assault - whether overall sentence of imprisonment for 25 years with a non-parole period of 18 years was unreasonable or plainly unjust - whether sentence accumulated to an excessive degree - whether period of imprisonment amounted to a crushing sentence - need for protection of the community Cases Cited: R v Gorman [2002] NSWCCA 516; (2002) 137 A Crim R 326 R v Haines [2004] NSWCCA 294 R v Hayes [1984] 1 NSWLR 740 R v MAK [2006] NSWCCA 381; (2006) 167 A Crim R 159 R v MSK [2006] NSWCCA 381; (2006) 167 A Crim R 159 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Silas Gordon Haines - Applicant Crown - Respondent Representation: T Gartelmann - Applicant T Smith - Crown Legal Aid New South Wales - Applicant S Kavanagh,Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW) - Crown File Number(s): 2009/11348 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2010-05-14 00:00:00 Before: Charteris DCJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate