NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Saleh v Victims Compensation Fund Corporation [2012] NSWDC 217 Hearing dates: 8-9 November 2012 Decision date: 14 November 2012 Before: Knox SC DCJ Decision: 1. Appeal allowed 2. Matter remitted for re-hearing by the Victims Compensation Tribunal 3. Liberty to apply for the matter to be listed on the issue of costs Catchwords: VICTIMS COMPENSATION - where workers compensation paid - different injury claimed - double dipping - error of law - failure to have regard to evidence - meaning of "have regard to" - interpretation of beneficial legislation Legislation Cited: Victims Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 1996 Workers Compensation Act 1987 Cases Cited: Mason v VCFC (District Court of NSW, 27 May 2003, unreported) Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; (1986) 162 CLR 24 Uren v VCFC [2003] NSWDC 2 Victims Compensation Fund Corporation v Brown [2002] NSWCA 155; (2002) 54 NSWLR 668 Victims Compensation Fund Corporation v Crowley [2000] NSWCA 378 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gamil Saleh (Appellant) Victims Compensation Fund Corporation (First respondent) Victims Compensation Tribunal (Second respondent) Representation: Mr D Del Monte (Appellant) Prominent Lawyers (Appellant) Crown Solicitors (Respondents) File Number(s): 2012/37783 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2011-11-07 00:00:00 Before: Chairperson File Number(s): DC 2012/138736
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate