NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Verzar v Verzar [2012] NSWSC 1380 Hearing dates: 17 and 18 September 2012 Decision date: 16 November 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Lindsay J Decision: Judgment for the Plaintiff. Parties invited to make submissions about the form of relief and costs. Catchwords: SUCCESSION - family provision and maintenance - circumstances precluding relief - extension of time - plaintiff operating under a personal disability or financial constraints - defendant initiated separate proceeding against plaintiff - extension of time granted.
SUCCESSION - family provision and maintenance - failure by testator to make sufficient provision for applicant - single parent plaintiff in fear of financial insecurity - plaintiff worked hard to build up wealth with testator - defendant obliged to care for a disabled step-child - relief granted. Legislation Cited: Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW) Succession Act 2006 Limitation Act 1969 (NSW), s 14 Cases Cited: In Re Salmon, Deceased [1981] Ch 167 at 175B; Re Guskett [1947] VLR 212 at 214. Warren v McKnight (1996) 40 NSWLR 390 at 394E Dare v Furness (1997) 44 NSWLR 493 at 500C Thomas v Pickering [2011] NSWSC 572 at [84]-[90 Re Lauer [1984] VR 180 Neil v Nott [1994] HCA 23 at [9]-[10]; 68 ALJR 509; 121 ALR 148 Singer v Berghouse (1994) 181 CLR 201 at 208-211 Vigolo v Bostin (2005) 221 CLR 191 Bosch v Perpetual Trustee Company Limited [1938] AC 463 at 476. Devereaux-Warnes v Hall (No. 3) (2007) 35 WAR 127 at [72]-]77]. Pontifical Society for the Propagation of the Faith v Scales (1962) 107 CLR 9 at 19. Singer v Berghouse (1994) 181 CLR 201 at 209-211. Collins v McGain [2003] NSWCA 190 at [41]-[42] and [45]-[51]. Luciano v Rosenblum [1985] 2 NSWLR 65 at 69-70 Bladwell v Davis [2004] NSWCA 170 at [12] and [18]-[19]. Tchadovitch v Tchadovitch [2010] NSWCA 316 at [53]-[60]. Young v Queensland Trustees Ltd (1956) 99 CLR 560 at 566; Holler v Ayre [2005] 2 Qd R 410 at 415. Texts Cited: Family Provision in Australia JK de Groot and BW Nickel, (Lexis Nexis Butterworths, Australia, 4th ed, 2012) at paragraphs [5.8]-[5.14] Category: Principal judgment Parties: S Verzar TJ Verzar Representation: RD Wilson (P) PH Blackburn-Hart SC and T Anderson (D) Teece Hodgson Denes Ebner File Number(s): 2011 / 115485
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate