NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Foster v Tolco Pty Limited [2012] NSWSC 1395 Hearing dates: 12, 13 November 2012 Decision date: 21 November 2012 Before: Adamson J Decision: (1) Judgment for the defendant. (2) Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs of these proceedings. Catchwords: TORT - negligence - workplace injury - where a duty to maintain equipment Legislation Cited: - Civil Liability Act 2002 Cases Cited: - Australian Postal Commission v Hayes [1989] FCA 176; 87 ALR 283 - Fox v Wood [1981] HCA 41; 148 CLR 438 - Onassis v Vergottis [1968] 2 Lloyds Rep 403 - Paric v John Holland (Constructions) Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 58; 59 ALJR 844 - Ramsay v Watson [1961] HCA 65; 108 CLR 642 - Shellenberg v Tunnel Holdings Pty Limited [2000] HCA 18; 200 CLR 121 - Strinic v Singh [2009] NSWCA 15; 74 NSWLR 419 - Watts v Rake [1960] HCA 58; 108 CLR 158 - Wolfenden v International Theme Park Pty Ltd (Trading As Wonderland) and Anor [2008] NSWCA 78 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Craig Foster (Plaintiff) Tolco Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Lidden SC / M Fraser (Plaintiff) R Kavanagh SC (Defendant) Solicitors: Brydens Law Office (Plaintiff) Wotton + Kearney Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2009/336377 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate