NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v SK; SK v R [2011] NSWCCA 292 Hearing dates: 27 September 2010 Decision date: 01 April 2011 Before: Giles JA at 1 Latham J at 2 Rothman J at 44 Decision: 1. Crown appeal allowed 2. Aplicant's application dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - evidence - tendency - admissibility and relevance - for particular purpose - sexual offences - whether evidence has significant probative value - whether there would be specific prejudice to the applicant in a joint trial Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: De Jesus v The Queen (1986) 68 ALR 1 DJV v R [2008] NSWCCA 272 Hoch v The Queen [1988] HCA 50 R v Fletcher [2005] NSWCCA 338 R v Ford [2009] NSWCCA 306 R v Milton [2004] NSWCCA 195 R v Watkins (2005) 153 A Crim R 434 Regina v PWD [2010] NSWCCA 209 Sutton v The Queen (1984) 152 CLR 528 Townsend v Townsend [2001] NSWCA 136 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: SK - (Applicant) Regina - (Crown Respondent) Representation: Counsel R Sweet - (Applicant) J Pickering - (Crown Respondent) Solicitors Galloways - (Applicant) S Kavanagh - Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/141735 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2010-08-24 00:00:00 Before: Syme DCJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate