NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: May v R [2012] NSWCCA 250 Hearing dates: 16 October 2012 Decision date: 30 November 2012 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] Johnson J at [35] Bellew J at [36] Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - conviction - conviction for possession of firearm contrary to Firearms Act 1996 - where firearm found in bedroom of appellant - where appellant denied knowledge of firearm - whether trial judge failed to give reasons that complied with s 133 of the Criminal Procedure Act - reasons of trial judge sufficient - whether verdict was unreasonable and cannot be supported by the evidence - where burden on appellant to prove that she did not know, or could not reasonably be expected to know, about firearm - verdict not unreasonable - appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Firearms Act 1996 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: AK v Western Australia [2008] HCA 8; 232 CLR 438 Housing Commission of New South Wales v Tatmar Pastoral Co Pty Ltd [1983] 3 R v Gardiner [2006] NSWCCA 190; (2006) 162 A Crim R 233 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michelle May (Appellant) Crown Representation: Counsel: K Averre (Appellant) S Dowling (Crown) Solicitors: Purcell Felton Lawyers (Appellant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2009/322559 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2011-07-28 00:00:00 Before: Finnane DCJ File Number(s): 2009/322559
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate