NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bis Industries Limited v Toll Holdings Limited & Anor [2012] NSWSC 1427 Hearing dates: 1, 2 and 6 November 2012 Decision date: 23 November 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Bergin CJ in Eq Decision: Restraints valid and enforceable Catchwords: [CONTRACT] - [RESTRAINT] - where two large organisations conducting negotiations for possible equity investment or purchase -where non-solicitation restraint agreed during due diligence regime - where due diligence process aborted after approximately three weeks - some confidential information provided - where approaches to employee made prior to entry into restraint - where employment secured after entry into restraint - whether restraint reasonable and enforceable - whether injunction should be granted.
[EMPLOYEE RESTRAINT] - where employee renegotiates notice period under contract - where employee agrees to 6 months restraint - whether restraint reasonable and enforceable - whether injunction should be granted. Legislation Cited: Restraints of Trade Act 1976 Cases Cited: Attwood v Lamont [1920] 3 KB 571 Cactus Imaging Pty Limited v Peters [2006] NSWSC 717; (2006) 71 NSWLR 9 Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Harper's Garage (Stourport) Ltd [1968] AC 269 Herbert Morris Ltd v Saxelby [1916] 1 AC 688 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Kores Manufacturing Co Ltd v Kolok Manufacturing Co Ltd [1957] 3 All ER 158 Kores Manufacturing Co Ltd v Kolok Manufacturing Co Ltd [1958] 2 All ER 65 Miller v Jackson [1977] QB 966 News Limited v Australian Rugby Football League Ltd (1996) 64 FCR 410 Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns & Ammunition Co Ltd [1894] AC 535 Patrick Stevedores No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia (No 3) [1998] HCA 30; (1998) 195 CLR 1 Portal Software v Bodsworth [2005] NSWSC 1179 Seven Network (Operations) Ltd v Warburton (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 386; (2011) 206 IR 450 SST Consulting Services Pty Ltd v Rieson [2006] HCA 31; (2006) 225 CLR 516 Tullett Prebon (Australia) Pty Limited v Simon Purcell [2008] NSWSC 852 Texts Cited: Heydon, JD, The Restraint of Trade Doctrine (LexisNexis Butterworths, 3rd ed., 2008) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bis Industries Limited (Plaintiff) Toll Holdings Limited (First Defendant) Deryl George Freeman (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: CRC Newlinds SC/MA Izzo (Plaintiff) MS White (First Defendant) N Manousaridis/A Poljak (Second Defendant) Solicitors: Corrs Chambers Westgarth (Plaintiff) Minter Ellison (First Defendant) Arns & Associates (Second Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/299977 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate