NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: HP Mercantile Pty Ltd v Dierickx & Ors (No. 2) [2012] NSWSC 1430 Hearing dates: 14 September 2012 Decision date: 26 November 2012 Before: White J Decision: Order that the plaintiff pay two-thirds of the defendants' costs on the ordinary basis. Catchwords: COSTS - failure to accept offer of compromise and Calderbank offers - offers made by defendants before the issue on which defendants were ultimately successful had been raised - no order for indemnity costs - Calderbank offers nonetheless relevant to exercise of costs discretion COSTS - successful party unsuccessful on some issues - whether issues are distinct and severable - fact that successful party did not act unreasonably in raising unsuccessful issues does not preclude modification of the usual order to reflect failure on those issues - delay in amending defence to raise issue on which defendants were ultimately successful not material because case would still have been vigorously prosecuted by plaintiff if amendments made earlier - suggested distinction between successful plaintiffs and defendants who reasonably raise unsuccessful severable issues doubted - exercise of costs discretion requires consideration of all circumstances - in circumstances, plaintiff ordered to pay two-thirds of defendants' costs Cases Cited: Reid, Hewitt & Company v Joseph [1918] AC 717 Waters v PC Henderson (Australia) Pty Ltd [1994] NSWCA 338; (1994) 254 ALR 328 Hughes v Western Australian Cricket Association Inc (1986) ATPR 40-748 Short v Crawley (No. 40) [2008] NSWSC 1302 Griffith v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (No. 2) [2011] NSWCA 145 South Eastern Sydney Area Health Service & Anor v King [2006] NSWCA 2 Permanent Trustee Australia Ltd v FAI General Insurance Co Ltd (Supreme Court of New South Wales, Hodgson CJ in Eq, 3 June 1998, unreported, BC9802305) Rosniak v Government Insurance Office (1997) 41 NSWLR 608 Commonwealth of Australia v Gretton [2008] NSWCA 117 PAC Mining Pty Ltd v Esco Corporation (No. 2) [2009] FCAFC 52 Beoco Limited v Alpha Laval Co Limited [1995] QB 137 Cretazzo v Lombardi (1975) 13 SASR 4 Bostik Australia Pty Ltd v Liddiard (No. 2) [2009] NSWCA 304 Bowen Investments Pty Ltd v Tabcorp Holdings Limited (No. 2) [2008] FCAFC 107 Category: Costs Parties: HP Mercantile Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Ludo Victor Dierickx (1st Defendant) Wendy Anne Dierickx (2nd Defendant) Tumut River Orchard Management Limited (In Liquidation) (3rd Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Fagan SC (Plaintiff) S Fendekian (Defendant) Solicitors: Versace McKenzie Lawyers (Plaintiff) Piper Alderman (1st & 2nd Defendants) File Number(s): 2006/294773
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate