NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Alomalu v R [2012] NSWCCA 255 Hearing dates: 4 October 2012 Decision date: 26 November 2012 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] Rothman J at [83] Adamson J at [84] Decision: 1. The appeal is allowed and the conviction is quashed. 2. Order the entry of a verdict of acquittal. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - conviction - appellant convicted of aggravated people smuggling -whether trial judge erred in refusing to direct jury regarding evidence given by appellant on essential element of Crown case - where appellant and key prosecution witness gave conflicting accounts - whether principle in Robinson v The Queen [1991] HCA 38; (1991) 180 CLR 531 was breached - whether direction in Liberato v The Queen [1985] HCA 66; (1985) 159 CLR 507 - principle in Robinson not breached - Liberato direction not required - appeal dismissed.
CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - whether verdict unreasonable and unsupported by evidence - where no evidence capable of showing appellant knew Ashmore Reef was part of Australia - where evidence gives rise to reasonable doubt that jury should have had - where jury advantage in seeing and hearing evidence not capable of resolving doubt - verdict unreasonable - appeal upheld.
CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - conviction - whether trial judge erred in not giving direction that accused intended to take passengers to Australia or that appellant knew Ashmore Reef was part of Australia - where central issue in trial not properly identified. Legislation Cited: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Bahar v R [2011] WASCA 249; (2011) 214 A Crim R 417 Latham v R [2000] WASCA 57 Liberato v The Queen [1985] HCA 66; (1985) 159 CLR 507 PJ v R [2012] VSCA 146 R v Smith [2000] NSWCCA 468 Robinson v The Queen [1991] HCA 38; (1991) 180 CLR 531 Short v R [2000] NSWCCA 462 SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; (2011) 243 CLR 400 Sunada v R; Jaru v R [2012] NSWCCA 187 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sakarias Alomalu (Appellant) Crown Representation: Counsel: S Corish (Appellant) P Neil SC (Crown) Solicitors: Purcell Felton Lawyers (Appellant) Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2011/137027 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2011-11-24 00:00:00 Before: Taylor ADCJ File Number(s): 2011/137027
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate