NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: GE Mortgage Solutions Limited v Jane Susan Fassos [2012] NSWSC 1446 Hearing dates: 14, 15, 16 and 17 May 2012 Decision date: 03 December 2012 Before: Bellew J Decision: 1. I enter judgment for the plaintiff. 2. I direct the parties to prepare Short Minutes of Order giving effect to the conclusions I have reached in this judgment. 3. I stand the proceedings over for further directions before me on Monday 10 December 2012 at 9.15 am. Catchwords: CONTRACTS REVIEW ACT - claim for possession by Mortgagee/lender - cross claim for relief under Contracts Review Act by Mortgagor/borrower - whether purpose of borrowing disentitled borrower to relief under the Act - where false information provided by the borrower in application for loan - whether provision of false information disentitled borrower to relief under the Act - conduct of lender - whether lender engaged in asset lending - whether lender failed to observe lending guidelines - whether contract unjust - whether discretionary relief should be granted
WORDS AND PHRASES - "asset lending" - "lo-doc loan" Legislation Cited: Contracts Review Act 1980 Cases Cited: Agricultural and Rural Finance Pty Ltd v Atkinson [2010] NSWSC 635 Australian Bank Limited v Stokes (1985) 3 NSWLR 174 Bank of Western Australia Limited v Primanzon [2010] NSWSC 862 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Munro [2011] NSWSC 128 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Roubas [1997] NSWSC 475 Ellison v Vukicevic (1986) 7 NSWLR 104Fast Fix Loans Pty Ltd v Samardzic [2011] NSWSC 260 Ford v Perpetual Trustees Victoria Limited [2009] NSWCA 186; 75 NSWLR 42 Permanent Mortgages Pty Ltd v McFadyen [2012] NSWSC 130 Perpetual Trustees Victoria Limited v Longobardi [2009] NSWSC 654 RHG Mortgage Corporation Limited v Baira [2011] NSWSC 520 Tonto Home Loans Australia Pty Ltd v Tavares; FirstMac Ltd v Di Benedetto; FirstMac Ltd v O'Donnell [2011] NSWCA 389 Toscano v Holland Securities Pty Limited (1985) 1 NSWLR 145 Category: Principal judgment Parties: GE Mortgage Solutions Limited (plaintiff / cross defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate