NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v MEYN, John Michael (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 1449 Hearing dates: 19, 20, 21 November 2012 Decision date: 21 November 2012 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: Tender of tendency evidence rejected. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Evidence - tendency - domestic homicide - murder - application on voir dire to adduce evidence that the accused has a tendency to act in a violent way when he has a disagreement with a person with whom he has or had an intimate relationship - alleged attempt to strangle previous partner's male colleague - alleged attempt to strangle previous partner - accused caused self harm following dispute with previous partner - similarity of acts - distance in time - whether significant probative value to facts in issue. Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 - s 55, s 97, s 98, s 101, s 138 Cases Cited: - Bangaru v R [2012] NSWCCA 204 - DSJ v R [2012] NSWCCA 9; 259 FLR 262 - R v Cittadini [2008] NSWCCA 256; 189 A Crim R 492 - R v Fletcher [2005] NSWCCA 338; 156 A Crim R 308 - R v Meyn (No 1) [2012] NSWSC 1441 - R v PWD [2010] NSWCCA 209; 205 A Crim R 75 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Crown (Prosecutor) John Michael Meyn (Accused) Representation: Counsel: T.W. Thorpe (Crown) K.A. Chapple SC (Accused) Solicitors: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) George Sten & Co (Accused) File Number(s): 2011/116480
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate