NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sciacca v Langshaw Valuations Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 1450 Hearing dates: 26 November 2012 Decision date: 27 November 2012 Before: McCallum J Decision: See [74] of the judgment Catchwords: PROCEDURE - costs - appeals as to costs - mistake of law - general rule that costs follow the event only displaced by disentitling conduct - third defendant to pay plaintiff's costs of motion.
PROCEDURE - discovery and interrogatories - discovery and inspection of documents -competent legal advice does not necessarily ensure that the obligations of a subpoena have been complied with- it was open to the deputy registrar to order the third defendant to attend court to be examined in respect of its response to the subpoenas. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Hexiva Pty Limited v Lederer [2006] NSWSC 561 House v The King (1936) 55 CL 499 Jackamarra v Krakouer [1998] HCA 27 (1998) 195 CLR 516 Pyoja Pty Limited v 284 Bronte Road Developments [2006] NSWSC 831; (2006) 67 NSWLR 1 Tomko v Palasty (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 369 Trade Practice Commission v Arnotts Limited (No 2) (1989) 21 FCR 306 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Frank Sciacca (first plaintiff) Maura Spresian (second plaintiff) Rosie Iannelli (third plaintiff) Vero Insurance (third defendant) Representation: Counsel: H Stitt (plaintiffs) D Lloyd (third defendant) Solicitors: File Number(s): 2011/90522
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate