NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Inspector Brandie v Hogan [2012] NSWIRComm 138 Hearing dates: 14 November 2012 Decision date: 07 December 2012 Jurisdiction: Industrial Court of NSW Before: Walton J, Vice-President Decision: 1. The defendant is convicted of the offence as charged. 2. The defendant is fined the sum of $32,000 with a moiety to the prosecutor. 3. The Court further orders that the defendant shall pay the costs of the prosecutor for these proceedings in the amount of $18,000. Catchwords: OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY - prosecution under s 8(2) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 - defendant employer operated go-kart business - go-karts rented to members of the public to ride on a track at defendant's workplace - risk of injury to persons operating go-karts as a result of loose or baggy clothing becoming caught in moving parts of go-karts - patron of business wearing hijab - loose material of the garment not restrained - material became entangled in left rear axle of go-kart - patron strangled - fatality - plea of guilty - sentencing - objective factors - maximum penalty - Australian Standards relevant to assessment of objective seriousness of offence, not aggravation - defendant did not conform with guidelines set out therein - risk foreseeable - simple remedial steps available - general deterrence - specific deterrence minimal - defendant's level of control of business considered - limited "hands on" role in business at time of incident - defendant's responsibility to ensure safety at workplace could not be delegated to employees - offence serious - subjective factors - remorse and contrition - co-operation with the prosecutor - discount for plea - early plea - consideration of financial means of defendant - no claim for impecuniosity - no basis for reduction in penalty on financial grounds - reduction in penalty by virtue of mitigating factor and subjective factors - penalty imposed - moiety - costs Legislation Cited: Fines Act 1996 Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 Cases Cited: Alcatel Australia Limited v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Clyant) (1996) 70 IR 99 Capral Aluminium Limited v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales [2000] NSWIRComm 71; (2000) 49 NSWLR 610; (2000) 99 IR 29 Ferguson v Nelmac Pty Limited (1999) 92 IR 188 Graincorp Operations Limited v Inspector Mason [2006] NSWIRComm 304; (2006) 157 IR 103 Inspector Dall v Ullrich [2012] NSWIRComm 87 Inspector Fraser v Karabelas (No 2) [2011] NSWIRComm 153 Inspector Howard v Baulderstone Hornibrook Pty Ltd [2009] NSWIRComm 92; (2009) 186 IR 125 Inspector Jose Barbosa v Newstart 150 Pty Ltd t/as Style Wise Interiors [2002] NSWIRComm 64; (2002) 113 IR 78 Inspector Lai v Rexma Pty Ltd and Another [2008] NSWIRComm 78; (2008) 172 IR 210 Inspector Middleton v Cafe C Pty Ltd [2012] NSWIRComm 131 Lawrenson Diecasting Pty Ltd v WorkCover Authority (NSW) (1999) 90 IR 464 Manpac Industries Pty Ltd (formerly t/as Pacific Concrete & Quarries Pty Ltd) v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Glass) [2001] NSWIRComm 190; (2001) 106 IR 435 Morrison v Powercoal Pty Ltd & Anor. (No. 3) [2005] NSWIRComm 61; (2005) 147 IR 117 Page v Walco Hoist Rentals Pty Ltd (No 2) [2000] NSWIRComm 39; (2000) 99 IR 163 R v Reader (Brian Henry) (1988) 10 Cr App R(S) 210 R v Rushby (1997) 1 NSWLR 594 Rahme v R (1989) 43 A Crim R 81 Retsos v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 85 WorkCover Authority (NSW) (Inspector Jones) v Challita [2006] NSWIRComm 207; (2006) 153 IR 409 WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Mayell) v D J Gleeson Pty Ltd [2006] NSWIRComm 363 WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Petar Ankucic) v McDonald's Australia Limited and Another [2000] NSWIRComm 277; (2000) 95 IR 383 Category: Sentence Parties: Inspector Philip Brandie (Prosecutor) Michael John Hogan (Defendant) Representation: R Reitano of counsel (Prosecutor) W Barry of counsel (Defendant) WorkCover Authority of NSW (Prosecutor) File Number(s): IRC 1933 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate