NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Tomic Industries Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 1478 Hearing dates: 28 November 2012 Decision date: 28 November 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Corporations List Before: White J Decision: Order that the originating process be dismissed; order that the plaintiffs pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - winding up - insolvency - whether service of statutory demand effective - statutory demand served on registered office through post but did not come to attention of company - alternative basis for service, by attaching statutory demand to originating process for winding-up application, not effective - submission that winding-up application is an abuse of process did not take account of regime imposed by Pt 5.4 - leave not required under s 459S in circumstances - genuine dispute as to liability - plaintiffs do not have a claim for debt due and payable but for damages for alleged breach of contract Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Woodgate v Garard Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 508; (2010) 78 ACSR 468; (2010) 239 FLR 339 Surdex Steel Pty Ltd v GB Manufacturing Pty Ltd [2012] VSC 90; (2012) 260 FLR 383 Tokich Holdings Pty Ltd v Sheraton Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd (in liq) [2004] NSWSC 527; 22 ACLC 955; (2004) 185 FLR 130 David Grant & Co Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1995) 184 CLR 265 House of Tan Pty Ltd v Beachiris Pty Ltd (1996) 21 ACSR 527; (1996) 14 ACLC 1536 Chief Commissioner of Stamp Duties v Paliflex Pty Ltd (1999) 17 ACLC 467; (1999) 199 FLR 179; (1999) 42 ATR 309 Braams Group Pty Ltd v Miric [2002] NSWCA 417; (2002) 171 FLR 449; 44 ACSR 124 Perpetual Nominees Ltd v Masri Apartments Pty Ltd (2004) 49 ACSR 719; (2004) 22 ACLC 975 Grant Thornton Services (NSW) Pty Ltd v St George Wholesale Distributors Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 1777 Willard King Organisation (1978) Pty Ltd v CT Franchises Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 97; (2009) 69 ACSR 612 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ian Hookham (1st Plaintiff) Sheryl Hookham (2nd Plaintiff) Tomic Industries Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: 2nd Plaintiff in person J T Johnson (Defendant) Solicitors: Lander & Rogers Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/249208
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate