NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Inspector Halcroft v Hardy Bros Mining and Constructions Pty Ltd [2012] NSWIRComm 140 Hearing dates: 12 & 13 June, 2012 (Mr Robert Hardy); 14 September 2012 (WesTrac); 19 November 2012 (all defendants) Decision date: 04 December 2012 Jurisdiction: Industrial Court of NSW Before: Haylen J Decision: (a) the defendant, WesTrac Pty Ltd, is found guilty of a breach of s 8(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 as particularised in the Amended Application for Order in Matter IRC 803 of 2011 to which it entered a plea of guilty; (b) the defendant is fined the sum of $150,000 with half that sum to be paid to the prosecutor by way of moiety; (c) the defendant is to pay the costs of the prosecutor in a sum as agreed or, in the absence of agreement, as ordered by the Court. (a) the defendant, Hardy Bros Mining and Constructions Pty Ltd, is found guilty of a breach of s 8(2) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 as particularised in the Amended Application for Order in Matter IRC 802 of 2011 to which it entered a plea of guilty; (b) the defendant is fined the sum of $105,000 with half that sum to be paid to the prosecutor by way of moiety; (c) the defendant is to pay the costs of the prosecutor in a sum as agreed or, in the absence of agreement, as ordered by the Court. (a) the defendant, Robert Leslie Hardy, is found guilty of a breach of s 8(2) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 by operation of s 26 as particularised in the further Amended Application for Order in Matter IRC 804 of 2011 to which he entered a plea of guilty; (b) the defendant is fined the sum of $11,250 with half that sum to be paid to the prosecutor by way of moiety; (c) the defendant is to pay the costs of the prosecutor in a sum as agreed or, in the absence of agreement, as ordered by the Court. Catchwords: OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT 2000 - s 8(1) s 8(2) s 26(1) - construction of dam on mine site - sub-contractor using leased dozer - need to repair ripper tine - repairs the responsibility of company leasing dozer to sub-contractor - lack of appropriate lifting gear at site - repairs attempted in field - heavy tine falls during lift - leasing company employee suffers loss of leg in accident - serious risk foreseeable - leasing company bears most responsibility for accident - defects in systems used by all defendants - general and specific deterrence - subjective factors considered - contrition and remorse demonstrated - application under s 10 (Crimes) Sentencing Procedure) Act - application refused - penalties imposed Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 Cases Cited: Inspector McGrath v Edmen Recruitment Pty Ltd [2012] NSWIRComm 108 Nesmat Pty Ltd v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (1998) 87 IR 312 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Inspector Bronwen Halcroft (Prosecutor) Hardy Bros Mining & Construction (Defendant in 11/802) WesTrac Pty Ltd (Defendant in 11/803) Robert Leslie Hardy (Defendant in 11/804) Representation: M Moir of counsel (Prosecutor) Mrs W Thompson of counsel (Defendants in 11/802 and 11/804) B Hodgkinson SC (Defendant in 11/803) Criminal Law Practice, Legal Group WorkCover Authority of NSW (Prosecutor) Carrol & O'Dea Lawyers (Defendants in IRC 11/802 & IRC 11/804) Middletons (Defendant in 11/803) File Number(s): IRC 802 of 2011 IRC 803 of 2011 IRC 804 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate