NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ahmed v R [2012] NSWCCA 260 Hearing dates: 24 September 2012 Decision date: 10 December 2012 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] Hidden J at [2] Adamson J at [3] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Order that the appeal be dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction - whether upon the whole of the evidence it was open to the jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was guilty - whether miscarriage of justice occasioned by the trial judge directing the jury that they were prohibited from returning different verdicts in respect of two counts on the indictment - whether the trial judge misdirected the jury as to facts which gave rise to being an accessory after the fact Legislation Cited: - Crimes Act 1900 - Firearms Act 1996 Cases Cited: - M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63; 181 CLR 487 - Chen v R [2010] NSWCCA 224 - MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53; 213 CLR 606 - Zoneff v The Queen [2000] HCA 28; 200 CLR 234 - Dhanhoa v The Queen [2003] HCA 40; 217 CLR 1 - FP v R [2012] NSWCCA 182 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bilal Ahmed (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Francis (Applicant) E Balodis (Respondent) Solicitors: Bannister Lawyers (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2010/133875 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2011-01-31 00:00:00 Before: Finnane DCJ File Number(s): 2010/133875
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate