NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Hobash Holdings Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 1501 Hearing dates: 30 November 2012 Decision date: 07 December 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: Defendant's statutory demand dated 20 March 2012 set aside. Defendant to pay Plaintiff's costs as agreed or as assessed. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - Winding up - Statutory demand - Affidavit in support of application - Whether grounds relied upon in application to set aside statutory demand were properly raised in affidavit in support of application - Genuine dispute ground - Whether genuine dispute established. Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 459G(3)(a), 459H, 459H(1)(a), 459J Cases Cited: - Central City Pty Ltd v Montevento Holdings Pty Ltd [2011] WASCA 5 - Elm Financial Services Pty Ltd v MacDougal [2004] NSWSC 560 - Eyota Pty Ltd v Hanave Pty Ltd (1994) 12 ACSR 785 - Financial Solutions Australasia Pty Ltd v Predella Pty Ltd [2002] WASCA 51; (2002) 26 WAR 306; 167 FLR 106 - Graywinter Properties Pty Ltd v Gas & Fuel Corporation Superannuation Fund (1996) 70 FCR 452; 21 ACSR 581 - Hansmar Investments Pty Ltd v Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd [2007] NSWSC 103; (2007) 61 ACSR 321; 25 ACLC 282 - Hopetoun Kembla Investments Pty Ltd v JPR Legal Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 1343; (2011) 87 ACSR 1 - Infratel Networks Pty Ltd v Gundry's Telco and Rigging Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 365 - Mibor Investments Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1994] 2 VR 290; (1993) 11 ACSR 362 - NA Investment Holdings Pty Ltd v Perpetual Nominees Ltd [2010] NSWCA 210; (2010) 79 ACSR 544 - Panel Tech Industries (Australia) Pty Ltd v Australian Skyreach Equipment Pty Ltd (No 2) [2003] NSWSC 896 - POS Media Online Ltd v B Family Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 147; (2003) 21 ACLC 533 - Re 2 Roslyn Street Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 512 - Saferack Pty Ltd v Marketing Heads Australia Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 1143; (2007) 25 ACLC 1392 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hobash Holdings Pty Limited (Plaintiff) William McNamara Real Estate Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M.A. Bradford (Plaintiff) G.A. Rich (Defendant) Solicitors: Carroll & O'Dea (Plaintiff) Stacks/The Law Firm (Defendant) File Number(s): 12/113719
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate