NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: PGM (No 2) v R [2012] NSWCCA 261 Hearing dates: 4 September 2012 Decision date: 10 December 2012 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] Garling J at [100] McCallum J at [101] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal to raise the first ground of appeal. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - conviction - whether verdict unreasonable or unsupported by the evidence - where evidence of complainant about witnessing sexual assault of another child demonstrated to be false - directions - whether trial judge properly directed jury regarding "lies" of complainant - whether trial judge's directions regarding absence of complainant at trial were in error - where trial judge did not warn jury about dangers of convicting on evidence of absent complainant - where trial judge referred to forensic disadvantage suffered by Crown due to absent complainant - where trial judge suggested absence of complainant solely due to procedural legislation. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Rules Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Cases Cited: Healey v R [2006] NSWCCA 235 Papakosmas v The Queen [1999] HCA 37; (1999) 196 CLR 297 PGM v R [2006] NSWCCA 310; (2006) 164 A Crim R 426 R v PGM [2008] NSWCCA 172; (2008) 187 A Crim R 152 RR v R [2011] NSWCCA 235 SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; (2011) 243 CLR 400 Category: Principal judgment Parties: PGM (Applicant) Crown Representation: Counsel: S Buchen (Applicant) F Veltro (Crown) Solicitors: Legal Aid of NSW (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2006/15199 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2008-02-22 00:00:00 Before: Graham DCJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate