NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: JD v R [2012] NSWCCA 274 Hearing dates: 15 November 2012 Decision date: 14 December 2012 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] Rothman J at [31] Bellew J at [32] Decision: Grant leave to appeal but dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - conviction - admission of evidence - whether trial judge erred in refusing to admit documents contemporaneously prepared by the applicant - where trial judge made admission of documents conditional on removal of prejudicial portions - whether document admissible under s 66A of the Evidence Act 1995 - whether document admissible under s 108 of Evidence Act 1995 - fresh evidence - new evidence - where document referred to in written and oral submissions at trial. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: R v Abou-Chabake [2004] NSWCCA 356; (2004) 149 A Crim R 417 TKWJ v The Queen [2002] HCA 46; (2002) 212 CLR 124 Wood v R [2012] NSWCCA 21 Category: Principal judgment Parties: JD (Applicant) Crown Representation: Counsel: D Dalton SC (Applicant) H Wilson (Crown) Solicitors: Nikola Velcic & Associations (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2010/392776 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2011-12-21 00:00:00 Before: Leatherbarrow DCJ File Number(s): 2010/392776
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate