NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Boyd v R [2012] NSWCCA 279 Hearing dates: 30 October 2012 Decision date: 14 December 2012 Before: Basten JA at [1] Adams J at [2] R A Hulme J at [3] Decision: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - past criminal history not in itself relevant to finding of remorse or contrition - sentencing judge entitled to reject evidence of remorse CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - whether sentencing judge erred in not finding special circumstances - discretionary decision - judge adverted to the issue but declined to make the finding - no error Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: Alvares v R; Farache v R [2011] NSWCCA 33 Bugmy v The Queen [1990] HCA 18; (1990) 169 CLR 525 Caristo v R [2011] NSWCCA 7 Deakin v The Queen [1984] HCA 31; (1984) 58 ALJR 367 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45, (2010) 242 CLR 520 Power v The Queen [1974] HCA 26; (1974) 131 CLR 623 Rees v R [2012] NSWCCA 47 R v Wickham [2004] NSWCCA 193 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Darren John Boyd (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms N Mikhaiel (Applicant) Ms H Wilson (Respondent) Solicitors: Aboriginal Legal Service Solicitor for Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2010/8469 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2011-03-18 00:00:00 Before: King DCJ File Number(s): 2010/245927
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate