NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Unilever Australia Limited v Rosella Foods Pty Limited [2012] NSWDC 221 Hearing dates: 19 October 2012 Decision date: 14 December 2012 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: P Taylor SC DCJ Decision: 1. Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $615,461.03 inclusive of interest. 2. The defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings up to and including 19 October 2012. Catchwords: Application seeking summary judgment - claim for payment for goods ordered and supplied - defence by way of an equitable set-off - cross-claim of no substance - whether a court is a "person" - proceeding with proceedings - delivery of reserved judgment Legislation Cited: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth), s 2C Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 440D Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 13.1, 13.4(1)(b), 36.3 and 36.4(3) Cases Cited: Arpic Pty Ltd v Austin Australia Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 83 Botany Bay City Council v Saab Corp Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 308 BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Hastings Shire Council (1977) 180 CLR 266 Brambles Holdings Ltd v Bathurst City Council (2001) 53 NSWLR 153 Castle Constructions Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2007] NSWCA 164 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority (NSW) (1982) 149 CLR 337 Emanuele v Australian Securities Commission [1997] HCA 20 Forsyth & Anor (as trustees for the C&S Forsyth Superannuation Fund) v Gibbs [2008] QCA 103 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125; [1964] HCA 69 Hartley Poynton Ltd v Ali [2005] VSCA 53, 11 VR 568 Just Juice Corp Pty Ltd, Re; James v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 8 ACSR 444 Kizon v Palmer (1997) 72 FCR 409 Lord v Direct Acceptance Corporation Ltd (Receiver and Manager Appointed) (in liq) (1993) 32 NSWLR 362 Pioneer Water Tanks (Australia 94) Pty Ltd v Delat Pty Ltd (1997) 25 ACSR 757 Product Development Solutions Australia Pty Ltd v Parametric Technology Corporation [2012] NSWCA 211 Roadshow Entertainment Pty Ltd v (ACN 053 006 269) Pty Ltd Receiver & Manager Appointed (formerly Cel Home Video Pty Ltd) (1997) 42 NSWLR 462 Slater v Global Finance Group Pty Ltd (1999) 30 ACSR 519 The Owners Strata Plan No. 64970 v Austruc Constructions Limited & Anor (No 3) [2010] NSWSC 60 Texts Cited: R P Meagher, W M C Gummow and J R F Lehane, Equity, Doctrines and Remedies, 3rd ed (1992) Butterworths Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Unilever Australia Limited (plaintiff/cross-defendant) Rosella Foods Pty Limited (defendant/cross-claimant) Representation: Mr N Bender (plaintiff/cross-defendant) Ms S Mirzabegian (defendant/cross-claimant) Baker & McKenzie (plaintiff/cross-defendant) Gilbert + Tobin (defendant/cross-claimant until 12 December 2012) Clayton Utz (defendant/cross-claimant from 12 December 2012) File Number(s): 2012/163073 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate