NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Trio Capital Limited (in liquidation) [2012] NSWSC 1595 Hearing dates: 2 November 2012 Decision date: 05 November 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: Orders made restraining person from leaving Australia on interim basis - warrant for apprehension of person issued and stayed subject to condition. Orders to be entered forthwith. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - Investigations - Possible contraventions of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - Whether evidence establishes that investigations are being carried out under Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) in relation to act or omission that constitutes or may constitute a contravention of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - Whether Court satisfied that a person is about to leave the jurisdiction or Australia in order to avoid being examined about the affairs of a company being wound up in insolvency or by the court - Whether evidence establishes a proper case for issue of a warrant for arrest to avoid the frustration of examination powers conferred on liquidators. Legislation Cited: - Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 486B, 1323, 1323(1)(k) Cases Cited: - Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Australian Investors Forum Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 130; (2003) 44 ACSR 503 - Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hawley [2008] FCA 1423; (2008) 250 ALR 57; 68 ACSR 79 - Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Krecichwost [2007] NSWSC 948; (2007) 213 FLR 314; 64 ACSR 411 - ASIC v Ludgates Corporate and Investment Advisory Services Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 625; (2003) 21 ACLC 1366 - Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (1992) 9 ACSR 404; 11 ACLC 75 - Quest Enterprises (NSW) Pty Ltd v Cassaniti [2007] NSWSC 519 - Re Rainbow Systems of Australia Pty Ltd; Wily v Parker (1996) 21 ACSR 171 - Re Richstar Enterprises Pty Ltd; Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Carey (No 3) [2006] FCA 433; (2006) 232 ALR 577; 57 ACSR 307 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Stephen James Parbery, Mark Robinson and Nicholas Martin as Liquidators of Trio Capital Limited (in liquidation) (Plaintiffs) Representation: Counsel: N. Bender (Plaintiffs) Solicitors: Church & Grace (Plaintiffs) File Number(s): 12/289567
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate