NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Williams v R [2012] NSWCCA 286 Hearing dates: 1 November 2012 Decision date: 20 December 2012 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Adams J at [17]; R A Hulme J at [30] Decision: Leave to appeal against conviction refused. Leave to appeal against sentence refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal and new trial - objections or points not raised in court below - Rule 4 of Criminal Appeal Rules - whether rule applies when trial continued after accused absconded but counsel remained - consideration as to role of counsel after accused absconded CRIMINAL LAW - particular offences - offences against the person - dangerous driving occasioning death or grievous bodily harm - whether accused remained the driver at the time of impact after passenger grabbed the steering wheel CRIMINAL LAW - procedure - hearing in open court and in presence of accused - accused absconding during trial - waiver of right to be present - discretion to continue trial in accused's absence CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - nature and circumstances of offence - dangerous driving occasioning death and grievous bodily harm - whether passenger grabbing steering wheel reduced objective seriousness of offence - whether error in accumulating sentences Legislation Cited: Bail Act 1978 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW) Road Traffic Act 1961 (SA) Road Transport (General) Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bassell v McGuiness (1981) 29 SASR 508 Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; (2007) 168 A Crim R 41 Duncan v R [2012] NSWCCA 78 House v The King [1940] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 Jamal v R [2012] NSWCCA 198 Jiminez v The Queen [1992] HCA 14; (1992) 173 CLR 572 Langman v Valentine [1952] 2 All ER 803 Makarov v R (No 2) [2008] NSWCCA 292 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; 194 CLR 610 Police v Thompson [2006] SASC 20; (2006) 45 MVR 37 R v Affleck (1992) 65 A Crim R 96 R v Black (NSWCCA 23 July 1998, unreported) R v Dunlop [2001] NSWCCA 435 R v Janceski [2005] NSWCCA 288 R v Jones [1998] SASC 7021; (1998) 72 SASR 281 R v McHardie & Danielson [1983] 2 NSWLR 733 R v Rayner [2002] NSWCCA 309 R v Reeves [1999] NSWCCA 269 R v Wilkins (1988) 38 A Crim R 445 Regina v XX [2009] NSWCCA 115; (2009) 195 A Crim R 38 Richards v R [2006] NSWCCA 262 Ricketts v Laws (1988) 14 NSWLR 311 Skipworth v R [2006] NSWCCA 37 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michelle Dorothy Vera Williams (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Russell (Applicant) Ms J Girdham SC (Respondent) Solicitors: Peter Murphy Criminal Law Solicitor for Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2009/90310 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2011-11-04 00:00:00 Before: Payne DCJ File Number(s): 2009/9031
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate