NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Qureshi v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 1605 Hearing dates: 5 November - 14 November 2012 Decision date: 15 November 2012 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rein J Decision: Documents tendered by the defendant to challenge evidence introduced by the plaintiff are admissible notwithstanding that they support an allegation of fraud that has not been particularised. Catchwords: EVIDENCE - admissibility and relevancy - pleadings and particulars in actions for defamation - purpose of tender to support an allegation of fraud rebutting evidence introduced by the plaintiff - defendant entitled to seek to undermine plaintiff's evidence without providing particulars in advance Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Piddington v Bennett & Wood Pty Ltd (1940) 63 CLR 533 Tabe v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd (Supreme Court of New South Wales, Hunt J, 27 March 1987, unreported, BC8701474) Tabe v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd (1987) A Def R 50-025; BC8700881 TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd v Antoniadis (1998) 44 NSWLR 682 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Zia Qadir Qureshi (Plaintiff) John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: B R McClintock SC; G R Rubagotti (Plaintiff) A Leopold SC; A T S Dawson; W Potter (Defendant) Solicitors: Landerer & Company (Plaintiff) Banki Haddock Fiora (Defendant) File Number(s): SC 2006/266893
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate