NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Print National Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2013] NSWADT 3 Hearing dates: 8 November 2012 and 10 December 2012 Decision date: 08 January 2013 Jurisdiction: Revenue Division Before: N S Isenberg, Judicial Member Decision: The application for a suppression order is refused. Catchwords: Application for suppression order; open justice; public hearing; section 75 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997. Legislation Cited: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Chiropractors and Osteopaths Act 1991 Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 Payroll Tax Act 2007 Taxation Administration Act 1996 Cases Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2009] FCAFC 185 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v PTLZ [2008] FCAFC 164 John Fairfax & Sons Ltd v Police Tribunal of New South Wales (1986) 5 NSWLR 465 John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v District Court of NSW (2004) 61 NSWLR 344; [2004] NSWCA 324 Paul v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] AATA 831 Pochi v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 26 ALR 247 QR v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police (GD) [2005] NSWADTAP 59 State of New South Wales (Justice Health) and anor v Dezfouli [2008] NSWADTAP 69 Shi v Migration Agents Registration Authority [2008] HCA 31 Walton v Momot [1997] NSWCA 334 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Print National Pty Ltd (Applicant) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Respondent) Representation: A Henskens SC and P Knowles (Applicant) S Kaur-Bains (Respondent) Bilbie Dan (Applicant) Crown Solicitor (Respondent) File Number(s): 126112
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate