NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Demlakian v Vilkev Pty Limited [2012] NSWDC 234 Hearing dates: 29 November 2012 Decision date: 29 November 2012 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: (1) Appeal allowed in part. (2) Each party pay his or its own costs. Catchwords: COSTS - Appeal from CTTT costs order in favour of litigant in person - nature and extent of costs which can be claimed by litigants in person - appeal allowed in part Legislation Cited: Consumer, Trade & Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001 (NSW), ss 36(5), 53 and 67(3)(a) Consumer, Trade & Tenancy Tribunal Regulation 2009 (NSW), cl 20(4) Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) Cases Cited: Cachia v Hanes (1994) 179 CLR 403 Kostas v HIA Insurance Services Pty Ltd t/as Home Owners Warranty (2010) 241 CLR 390 Patel v Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal (NSW) and Malaysian Airlines Australia [2011] NSWDC 4 Thomas v Hills Motorsport (Motor Vehicle) [2010] NSWCTTT 296 Tsu v Nemeth [2012] NSWCA 29 Williams v NSW Land and Housing Corporation [2012] NSWSC 1022 Texts Cited: - Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: Josie Demlakian Defendant: Vilkev Pty Limited Representation: Plaintiff: Mr N W Eastman Defendant: Mr K Weston (in person) Plaintiff: Malcolm John Wright Lawyer Defendant: Mr K Weston (in person) File Number(s): 2012/276823 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate