NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Mahaffy (No. 2) [2012] NSWDC 236 Hearing dates: 30 November 2012 Decision date: 14 December 2012 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: Upon the defendants' undertaking to the court to proceed expeditiously with any appeal from the orders of Judicial Registrar Smith, the court orders: (1) Pursuant to s 135(2)(c) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005, upon the terms set out in paragraphs 2 and 3 the court orders that the judgment given in favour of the plaintiff be stayed until 4pm Friday 14 December 2012. (2) The defendants' notice of motion filed on 5 November 2012 is dismissed. (3) The defendants pay the plaintiff's costs of and incidental to the notice of motion. (4) The court dispenses with the need for a notice of motion in relation to the application for a stay of the judgment and with any requirement for notice. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application to set aside summary judgment and dismissal of cross-claim by Judicial Registrar - jurisdiction of District Court - UCPR Pt 36 r 36.15 and 36.16 - application dismissed with costs Legislation Cited: District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 127 Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 36.2, 36.15 and 36.16 Cases Cited: Ahmed v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 6 Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 AT v Commissioner of Police (No 2) [2010] NSWCA 337 Bar-Mordecai v Attorney-General (NSW); Bar-Mordecai v State of NSW [2012] NSWCA 207 Bastian v Travel Air International Pty Ltd [2011] NSWLC 33 Brereton v Higgins [2004] NSWCA 48 Brittingham v Williams [1932] VLR 237 Cranbrook v Stanley [2002] NSWCA 290 Dillon v Boland; Dillon v Cush [2012] NSWCA 364 DJL v Central Authority (2000) 201 CLR 226 Fuller v Toms [2012] FCAFC 155 Hoskins v Van Den-Braak (1998) 43 NSWLR 290 Housing Commission of NSW v Tatmar Pastoral Co (1983) 3 NSWLR 378 Miltonbrook Pty Ltd v Westbury Holdings Kiama Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 38 Mothership Music Pty Ltd v Flo Rida (aka Tramar Dillard) [2012] NSWCA 344 National Parks and Wildlife Service v Pierson [2002] NSWCA 273; (2002) 55 NSWLR 315 Public Service Board of NSW v Osmond (1986) 159 CLR 656 R v Ireland (197) 126 CLR 321 Rosing v Shemesh [1960] VR 173 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 Zakaria v Dr Noyce [2012] NSWSC 981 Texts Cited: - Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant: Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd First Defendant/Cross-Claimant: David Bruce Mahaffy Second Defendant/Cross-Claimant: D B Mahaffy & Associates Pty Ltd Representation: Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant: Mr C D Wood Defendants/Cross-Claimant: Mr D B Mahaffy (in person) Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant: Minter Ellison Defendants/Cross-Claimant: Mr D B Mahaffy (in person) Amicus Curiae: Mr G Jauncey File Number(s): 2011/298755 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate