NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Azmin Firoz Daya v CX Reinsurance Company Limited [2012] NSWSC 1616 Hearing dates: 24 October 2012 Decision date: 24 October 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Corporations List Before: Brereton J Decision: Rulings on objections to evidence Catchwords: EVIDENCE - objections to evidence - relevance - Evidence Act, s 55 - plaintiff seeks indemnity under policy of insurance -defendant seeks to avoid policy on ground of material non-disclosure - defendant seeks to tender audio recordings of conversations between corporate officers - whether material could rationally affect the existence of the probability that the plaintiff was aware of certain facts
EVIDENCE - objections to evidence - provisional relevance - Evidence Act, s 57
EVIDENCE - objections to evidence - authenticity and provenance - where defendant proposes to adduce transcripts of audio recording of teleconferences - Evidence Act, s 48(1)(c) - where what is being tendered is not the transcript but the audio recording as proved by the tender of the transcript - where prima facie the audio recording is likely to be a business record of at least one of the parties to the teleconference
EVIDENCE - objections to evidence - s 135 - whether evidence more probative than prejudicial Legislation Cited: (Cth) Insurance Contracts Act 1984, s 28(2), s 28(3) (NSW) Evidence Act 2005, s 48(1)(c), s 55(1), s 57(2), s 69(3) Cases Cited: Ingot Capital Investments v Macquarie Equity Capital Markets (No 6) [2007] NSWSC 124; (2007) 63 ACSR 1 Ingot Capital Investments v Macquarie Equity Capital Markets [2008] NSWCA 206; (2008) 73 NSWLR 653; (2008) 68 ACSR 595 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Azmin Firoz Daya - Plaintiff CX Reinsurance Company Limited - First Defendant Eagle Star Reinsurance Company - Second Defendant Aviva Insurance Limited - Third Defendant Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's - Fourth Defendant Royal & Sun Alliance plc - Fifth Defendant International Insurance Company of Hannover Ltd - Sixth Defendant Representation: Mr J Williams - Plaintiff Mr J Sexton SC and Mr E Muston - First to Sixth Defendants Sparke Helmore - Plaintiff HWL Ebsworth - First to Sixth Defendants File Number(s): 2004/175282
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate