NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the Matter of Maiden Civil Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 1618 Hearing dates: 30 October 2012 Decision date: 30 October 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Corporations List Before: Brereton J Decision: Rulings on admissibility of evidence Catchwords: EVIDENCE - admissibility - business record - Evidence Act, s 69 - previous representation in document - whether representation was made or recorded in course of business - whether person who made representation had first hand knowledge of facts asserted - where there is dispute as to provenance or authenticity of document - where document produced by third party
EVIDENCE - admissibility - business record - Evidence Act, s 69 - documents that purport to be financial documents of plaintiffs - whether inference can be drawn from face of the documents - whether authenticity can be inferred from form and content of document alone - where there is no other evidence to authenticate - whether production on subpoena would be sufficient to found the inference that it is a business record Legislation Cited: (NSW) Evidence Act 1995, s 69, s 69(3) Cases Cited: Albrighton v Royal Prince Alfred Hospital [1980] 2 NSWLR 542 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich [2005] NSWSC 417 Citibank Ltd v Chiu Wah Liu [2003] NSWSC 236 Daw v Toyworld (NSW) Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 25 Kingham v Sutton (No 3) [2001] FCA 1117 Lee v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 305 Marra Developments Ltd and the Companies Act [1979] 2 NSWLR 193 National Australia Bank Ltd v Rusu [1999] NSWSC 539 O'Meara v Dominican Fathers [2003] ACTCA 24 Texts Cited: S Odgers, Uniform Evidence Law, 8th edition, Thomson Reuters Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Richard Albarran and Blair Pleash as Receivers and Managers of Maiden Civil (P&E) Pty Ltd - First Plaintiffs Fast Financial Solutions Pty Ltd - Second Plaintiff Queensland Excavation Services Pty Ltd - First Defendant Central Plant Hire (NT) Pty Ltd - Second Defendant Sitzler Pty Ltd - Third Defendant Laing O'Rourke Australia Construction Pty Ltd - Fourth Defendant McMahon Services Australia Pty Ltd - Fifth Defendant Wayne Cullenane - Sixth Defendant Representation: Counsel: H N Newton - Plaintiffs A H Sinclair (QLD) - First Defendant Wayne Cullenane - Sixth Defendant (In person) Solicitors: Thomsons Lawyers - Plaintiffs The M Kent Law Firm - First Defendant File Number(s): 2012/ 244768
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate