NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Court v University of Western Sydney [2013] NSWADT 16 Hearing dates: 29 November 2012 (on the papers) Decision date: 24 January 2013 Jurisdiction: Equal Opportunity Division Before: Magistrate N Hennessy, Deputy President Decision: 1. The application for summary dismissal is refused. 2. The following directions are made; a) By 1 March 2013, Ms Court is to file and serve a Points of Claim document setting out the legal basis for a complaint of indirect disability discrimination and any complaint of victimisation which accords with these reasons: b) If Ms Court fails to file and serve Points of Claim without reasonable excuse by 1 March 2013, the complaint will be dismissed on 2 March 2013; c) If Ms Court files and serves Points of Claim by 1 March 2013, the matter will be listed for a case conference at 2.30 pm on 6 March 2013. Catchwords: SUMMARY DISMISSAL - whether complaints, if proven, could amount to a contravention of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 - complaints of indirect disability discrimination and victimisation misconceived - further opportunity given to characterise complaints Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Cases Cited: Sullivan v State of NSW (NSW Police Force) [2009] NSWADT 2 Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service v Orr (EOD) [2001] NSWADTAP 16 Razaghi v Director-General, NSW Department of Health & Anor [2001] NSWADT 4 Amery & Ors v State Of New South Wales (Director-General NSW Department of Education and Training) [2004] NSWCA 404 Australian Iron and Steel Pty Ltd v Banovic [1989] HCA 56; (1989) 168 CLR 165 Waters v Public Transport Corporation [1991] HCA 49; (1991) 173 CLR 349 New South Wales v Amery [2006] HCA 14; (2006) 80 ALJR 753 Perera v Civil Service Commission [1982] IRLR 147 Dutt v Central Coast Area Health Service [2002] NSWADT 133 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Katherine Court (Applicant) University of Western Sydney (Respondent) Representation: Counsel K Eastman SC (Respondent) K Court (Applicant in person) Minter Ellison Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 121057
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate