NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Suman v R [2013] NSWCCA 3 Hearing dates: 6 December 2012 Decision date: 01 February 2013 Before: Simpson J at [1] McCallum J [2] Bellew J [39] Decision: Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIME - sentencing - whether sentencing judge erred by adopting an impermissible tiered or mathematical approach - whether sentencing judge erred in the exercise of the discretion as to the degree of accumulation between sentences - whether aggregate sentence manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Firearms Act 1996 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Cases Cited: Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; (2007) 168 A Crim R 41 Markarian v R [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 R v Hammoud [2000] NSWCCA 540; (2000) 118 A Crim R 66 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nirmal Suman (applicant) Regina (respondent) Representation: Counsel: GD Wendler (applicant) R Herps (Crown) Solicitors: Van Houten Solicitors (applicant) Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (respondent) File Number(s): 2010/370788 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2012-02-10 00:00:00 Before: Woods DCJ File Number(s): 2010/370788
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate