NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Parris v R [2013] NSWCCA 5 Hearing dates: 10 December 2012 Decision date: 01 February 2013 Before: McClellan CJ at CL [1]; Latham J at [2]; Adamson J at [3] Decision: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - whether sentence manifestly excessive - parity principle Legislation Cited: - Crimes Act 1900 - Drugs Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 - Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Act 1966 Cases Cited: - Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 - Lowe v The Queen [1984] HCA 46; 154 CLR 606 - Paxton v R [2011] NSWCCA 242 - R v Lipton [2012] NSWDC 201 - R v Shi [2004] NSWCCA 135 - R v Taouk (1993) 65 A Crim R 387 - Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; 207 CLR 584 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Andrew Parris (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Lange (Applicant) N Noman (Respondent) Solicitors: Matouk Joyner Lawyers (Applicant) S Kavanagh (Solicitor for Public Prosecutions) (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/4977013 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Citation: N/A Before: Finnane DCJ File Number(s): 2009/4977013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate