NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: AMZ v R [2013] NSWCCA 6 Hearing dates: 10 December 2012 Decision date: 01 February 2013 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1]; Latham J at [2]; Adamson J at [3] Decision: Grant leave to appeal. Dismiss the appeal Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - drugs offences - whether discount for assistance should be increased - whether sentence manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: - Crimes Act 1900 - Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 - Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Act 1966 Cases Cited: - Housing Commission of NSW v Tatmar Pastoral Co (1983) 3 NSWLR 378 - Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 - Springer v R [2007] NSWCCA 289; 177 A Crim R 13 - Selvanayagam v University of West Indies [1983] 1 WLR 585 - SZ v R [2007] NSWCCA 19; 168 A Crim R 249 Category: Principal judgment Parties: AMZ (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Lange (Applicant) N Noman (Respondent) Solicitors: Trimmer Criminal Defence Lawyers (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2011/50531 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 2011-12-02 00:00:00 Before: Berman DCJ File Number(s): 2011/50531
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate