NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: CTI Joint Venture Company Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2013] NSWSC 20 Hearing dates: 29 October 2012 Decision date: 30 January 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Revenue List Before: Gzell J Decision: Arrangement constituted a novation and neither s 8(1)(b)(i) nor s 8(1)(a) of the Duties Act 1997 applied. Assessment revoked. Catchwords: TAXES AND DUTIES - Stamp Duties - call options with power in optionee to nominate a substitute - whether an agreement for sale or transfer within s 8(1)(b)(i) of the Duties Act 1997 - nomination effected by giving a call option nomination notice - whether a transfer of dutiable property within s 8(1)(a) of the Act Legislation Cited: Duties Act 1997 (NSW) Cases Cited: ALH Group Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2012] HCA 6; (2012) 245 CLR 338 Braham v Walker [1961] HCA 7; (1961) 104 CLR 327 Carter v Hyde [1923] HCA 36; (1923) 33 CLR 115 Coles Myer Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue (Vic) (1998) 4 VR 728 Commissioner of Taxes (Qld) v Camphin [1937] HCA 30; (1937) 57 CLR 127 Gathercole v Smith (1881) 17 Ch D 1 Goldsborough Mort & Co Ltd v Quinn [1910] HCA 20; (1910) 10 CLR 674 Laybutt v Amoco Australia Pty Ltd [1974] HCA 49; (1974) 132 CLR 57 Littlewoods Mail Order Stores Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1963] AC 135 Franklins Pty Ltd v Metcash Trading Ltd [2009] NSWCA 407; (2009) 76 NSWLR 603 at 698 [388] Re United Railways of the Havana and Regla Warehouses Ltd [1960] 1 Ch 52 Scarf v Jardine (1882) 7 App Cas 345 Spiro v Glencrown Properties Ltd [1991] Ch 537 Texts Cited: JW Carter, Elisabeth Peden and GJ Tolhurst, Cases and Materials on Contract Law in Australia, 5th ed (2007) LexisNexis Butterworths Category: Principal judgment Parties: CTI Joint Venture Company Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Richmond SC/ Christopher Peadon (Plaintiff) N Hutley SC/ M Sealey (Defendant) Solicitors: King & Wood Mallesons (Plaintiff) Crown Solicitors Office (Defendant) File Number(s): SC 2012/165290
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate