NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: MURRAY, Justin James v R [2013] NSWCCA 12 Hearing dates: 02/10/2012 Decision date: 05 February 2013 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at 1 Rothman J at 5 Adamson J at 71 Decision: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence appeal - relevance of capacity to deal with some charges summarily - use of guideline judgment - totality - manifest excess - by majority, no manifest excess and sentence within discretion Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: Dinsdale v R [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 202 CLR 321 Johnson v R [2004] HCA 15; (2004) 78 ALJR 616 Markarian v R [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 Muldrock v R [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120 Pearce v R [1998] HCA 57; (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 R v Whyte [2002] NSWCCA 343; (2002) 55 NSWLR 252 Stanford v R [2007] NSWCCA 73 Veen v R (No 2) [1988] HCA 14; (1988) 164 CLR 465 Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Justin James Murray (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Burgess (Applicant) N Bruni (Respondent) Solicitors: McGowan Lawyers (Applicant) Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2010/52405 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2011-09-02 00:00:00 Before: Berman DCJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate