NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Pettersen v R [2013] NSWCCA 20 Hearing dates: 5/02/2013 Decision date: 13 February 2013 Before: Beazley JA at [1] Fullerton J at [2] Beech-Jones at [52] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - aggravated break and enter with intent to steal - conspiracy - attempt - whether misdescription of offence and applicable penalty infected sentence - Muldrock principles Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Bell v R: Jelisavac v R [2009] NSWCCA 206 Butler v R [2012] NSWCCA 23 Diesing v R [2007] NSWCCA 326 Markarian v R [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Muldrock v R [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Ehrlich [2012] NSWCCA 38 Savvas (No 2) v R (1991) 58 A Crim R 174 Stewart v R [2012] NSWCCA 183 Tyler v R; R v Chalmers [2007] NSWCCA 247; 173 A Crim R 458 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Neil Andrew Pettersen (Applicant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: K Averre (Applicant) H Wilson/J Michie (Crown) Solicitors: B Duchen (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2011/287342 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2012-04-19 00:00:00 Before: Norrish QC DCJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate