NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: NAR v PPC1 [2013] NSWCCA 25 Hearing dates: 13 February 2013 Decision date: 15 February 2013 Before: Hoeben JA at [1] Adams J at [2] Beech-Jones J at [7] Decision: Leave to appeal refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - interlocutory appeal -sexual assault communications privilege - issue of subpoena and production of documents subject to leave - inspecting subpoenaed documents for protected confidences - consent to production - whether compelled documents had substantial probative value - Criminal Procedure Act 1986, ss 295-306
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - limits on legislative power of States - essential characteristics of State court receiving federal jurisdiction - sexual assault communications privilege - State law prohibits compelled production of counselling communications - issue of subpoena and production of documents subject to leave - repugnancy to judicial power or institutional integrity of State court - Criminal Procedure Act 1986, ss 295-306 Legislation Cited: - Crimes Act 1900 - s 61I, s 61L - Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - s 5F(3) - Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) - s 270.6 - Criminal Procedure Act 1986 - s 293, s 295, s 296, s 298, s 299B, s 299D, s 300, Ch 6 Pt 5 Div 2 - Evidence Act 1995 - Pt 3.7 Div 2, Pt 3.10 Div 1B - Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) - s 79(1) Cases Cited: - Alister v R (1983) 154 CLR 404 - JAD v The Queen [2012] NSWCCA 73 - Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [1996] HCA 24; 189 CLR 51 - KS v Veitch [2012] NSWCCA 186 - KS v Veitch (No 2) [2012] NSWCCA 266 - Queanbeyan City Council v Environment Protection Authority [2011] NSWCCA 108 - R v Einfeld [2008] NSWCCA 215; 71 NSWLR 31 - R v Van Phu Huo (New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal, 18 July 1994, unrep) Category: Principal judgment Parties: "NAR" (Applicant) "PPC1" (First Respondent) Crown (Second Respondent) Attorney General of New South Wales (Intervenor) Representation: Counsel: Mr S. Sivaloganathan (Applicant) Mr P.M. Strickland SC, Mr G.F. Jauncey (First Respondent) Ms J.R. Dwyer (Second Respondent) Dr J.G. Renwick SC, Mr R. Rankin (Intervenor - Attorney General of New South Wales) Solicitors: Jeffreys Lawyers (Applicant) Heenan & Co (First Respondent) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Second Respondent) Crown Solicitor's Office of New South Wales (Intervenor - Attorney-General of New South Wales) File Number(s): 2011/008243 Publication restriction: Note that this version of the judgment has been modified from the version published to the parties to use a pseudonym for the applicant who is awaiting trial, and a variant on the pseudonym of the victim from that which was originally published. Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2012-08-20 00:00:00 Before: Zahra DCJ File Number(s): 2011/008243
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate