NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Rojas (No. 2) [2013] NSWDC 9 Hearing dates: 14 February 2013 Decision date: 14 February 2013 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant for the sum of $145,238.06. (2) The defendant pay the plaintiff's costs. (3) Exhibits retained for 28 days. Catchwords: TAXATION - income tax - penalties - director of non-remitting company - whether notice served - whether "all reasonable steps" taken - failure of defendant to file evidence Legislation Cited: Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), s 222AOD Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth), ss 255-45, 268-10, 268-15, 268-20, 268-25, 269-20(3), 269-35(3) and 269-50 Cases Cited: Canty v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2005) 63 NSWLR 152; [2005] NSWCA 84 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Broadbeach Properties Pty Ltd (2008) 237 CLR 473 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Gleeson [2010] QSC 260 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Gruber (1998) 43 NSWLR 271 Robertson v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2010] ATC 20-174; (2010) 239 FLR 29; [2010] NSWCA 58 Texts Cited: - Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: Deputy Commissioner of Taxation Defendant: David Fernando Rojas Representation: Plaintiff: Mr D Jay Defendant: No appearance Plaintiff: ATO Legal Services Branch Defendant: No appearance File Number(s): 2012/396587 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate