NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: LANG, Dylan Craig v R [2013] NSWCCA 29 Hearing dates: 12 December 2012 Decision date: 19 February 2013 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at 1 Rothman J at 2 Adamson J at 54 Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted; (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence appeal - manifestly excessive; whether - parity between co-offenders - mistaken view of concurrency in applicant's sentence in setting co-offender's sentence relied on for disparity - justifiable sense of grievance - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Cases Cited: Dinsdale v R [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 202 CLR 231 Hili v R; Jones v R [2010] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 R v Johnson [2004] NSWCCA 76 R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; (2006) 66 NSWLR 566 R v Whyte [2002] NSWCCA 343; (2002) 55 NSWLR 252 Veen v R (No 2) [1988] HCA 14; (1988) 164 CLR 465 Wong v R; Leung v R [2001] HCA 64; (2001) 207 CLR 584 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dylan Craig Lang (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: K Averre (Applicant) P G Ingram SC (Respondent) Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2010/420036 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2011-09-21 00:00:00 Before: Blanch CJDC File Number(s): 2010/420036
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate