NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Vandeventer v R [2013] NSWCCA 33 Hearing dates: 12 December 2012 Decision date: 15 February 2013 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] Rothman J at [2] Adamson J at [3] Decision: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - application for leave to appeal against sentence - whether sentence manifestly excessive - whether failure to apply principles of parity and totality Legislation Cited: - Crimes Act 1900 - Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: - Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; 194 CLR 610 - Attorney-General's Application (No 1) R v Ponfield [1999] NSWCCA 435; 48 NSWLR 327 - Lowndes v The Queen [1999] HCA 29; 195 CLR 665 - Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; 207 CLR 584 - Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Joshua Vandeventer (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: K Averre (Applicant) P Ingram SC (Crown) Solicitors: Legal Aid Commission of NSW (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2010/351748 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 2011-08-31 00:00:00 Before: Blackmore DCJ File Number(s): 2010/351748
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate